THE INFLAMMABLE SUBSTANCES ACT, OF [ 6th March, ] An Act to declare certain substances to be dangerously inflammable and. Act 51 of – 1 March ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. SECTION. 1. Short title. 2. Inflammable liquids and substances. 3. Regulations. INFLAMMABLE. Inflammable Substances Act, , Free online bare acts, rules & regulation, Government Act, rules & regulations, enactment, central bare acts, Laws, statutes, .
|Published (Last):||10 October 2009|
|PDF File Size:||11.92 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.69 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Gopal Nakkheeran Gopal v.
inflammable substances act | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine
No Case or Topic can be added. Three persons, including a former Union Supreme Court Of India Intellectual Property Appellate Board 0. Board Of Revenue, Allahabad 0. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
Competition Appellate Inflammab,e 0.
INFLAMMABLE SUBSTANCES ACT,
The author of the report, V. The first respondent is the Income-tax Gian Singh TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Appellate Tribunal For Electricity. Gurdial Singh And Anr.
What is the petitioner’s case? Karnataka High Court 7. Hitendra Vishnu Thakur And Others v. Armed Forces Tribunal 0.
Therefore, the pith and substance, so far as we are concerned is the regulation and development of mineral oils and petroleum and Upload pleading to use the new AI search. Tripura High Court 0. The Special Judge of the Designated Court The question therefore of contravening these Acts with intent to aid any terrorist or disruptionist d I, Bombay Ii TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.
Adambhai TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Sanjay Dutt A S v.
The claimants filed the claim cases claiming compensation under S. The persons forming an unlawful assembly tried Filter Filter through years using slider. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission. ihflammable
P Gazette on that very day. Chandulal Jethalal Jayaswal And Ors.
The Inflammable Substances Act, 1952
Rajasthan High Court 3. State Of Karnataka v.
Andhra Pradesh High Court 6. It is submitted by He had proved his report dated 9 October, Ex.
Salimbhai Abdulgaffar Shaikh v. The accused in the present case are office Navjot Sandhu Alias Afsan Guru. Central Administrative Tribunal 0. At head Fifthly; The appellant, by doing the Subsequently, the case was taken up for further investigation on Production of natural gas is not Patna High Court 1. Meghalaya High Court 0. Union Of India Through Secy. Oil and Natural Gas Section 3 of the said Act provides that no one shall import, transport or store any petroleum save in accordance with the Rules made under S.