The Declaration of Helsinki is a set of ethical principles regarding human experimentation Clarifications of Articles 29, 30 (–); Sixth revision (); Seventh revision (). 3 Future; 4 Timeline (WMA meetings); 5 See. Helsingforsdeklarationen som en sam- ling etiska principer i syfte att vägleda läkare och andra som medverkar i medi- cinsk forskning som omfattar männi- skor. Från Helsingforsdeklarationen och Biomedicinkonventionen till den svenska Genom en ändring i lagen ändras etikprövningslagens definition av.

Author: Duhn Mazuhn
Country: Grenada
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 21 September 2008
Pages: 357
PDF File Size: 11.56 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.34 Mb
ISBN: 454-2-60160-384-9
Downloads: 63602
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Voodoogore

The Declaration is morally binding on physicians, and that obligation overrides any national or local laws or regulations, if the Declaration provides for a higher standard of protection of humans than the latter. Scientific Requirements and Research Protocols The Medical Journal of Australia.

Declaration of Helsinki

Foreign clinical studies not conducted under an investigational new drug application. Another is whether it should concentrate on basic principles as opposed to being more prescriptive, and hence controversial. Any experimental manoeuvre was to be compared to the best available care as a comparator Article II.

This committee must be helsingforsdeklaratipnen in its functioning, must be independent of the researcher, the sponsor and any other undue influence and must be duly qualified.

The recognition of the increased vulnerability of individuals and groups calls for special vigilance Article 8.

JAMA Dec 20 The protocol should helsijgforsdeklarationen the ethical issues and indicate that it is in compliance with the Declaration Article Medical research is subject to ethical standards that promote and ensure respect for all human subjects and protect their health and rights.


Studies should be discontinued if the available information indicates that the original considerations are no longer satisfied Article The controversies uelsingforsdeklarationen national divisions over the text have continued.

Declaration of Helsinki – Wikipedia

Wherever possible unproven methods should be tested in the context of research where there is reasonable belief of possible benefit Article University Publishing Group, Inc.

Unproven Interventions in Clinical Practice By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. In clinical trials, the protocol must also describe appropriate arrangements for post-trial provisions. Surprisingly, although the wording was virtually unchanged, this created far more protest in this revision.

Some groups and individuals are particularly vulnerable and may have an increased likelihood of being wronged or of incurring additional harm. The most controversial revisions [39] Articles 29, 30 were placed in this new category. The physician must fully inform the patient which aspects of their care are related to the research.

All vulnerable groups and individuals should receive specifically considered protection. Now doctors were asked to obtain consent ‘if at all possible’ and research was allowed without consent where a proxy consent, such as a legal guardian, was available Article II. For a potential research subject who is incapable of giving informed consent, the physician must seek informed consent from the legally authorised representative.

Retrieved July 18, Maintaining credibility in the face of ethical controversies.

Forskning som involverar människan

The risks must be continuously monitored, assessed and documented by the researcher. No amendment to the protocol may be made without consideration and approval by the committee. The ethics of research related to healthcare in developing countries.

Beneficence Justice Respect for persons Privacy for research participants Right to withdraw Return of results Informed consent. The promise and limits of international bioethics: A notable change from the Nuremberg Code was a relaxation of the conditions of consent, which was ‘absolutely essential’ under Nuremberg.


Physicians must consider the ethical, legal and regulatory norms and standards for research involving human subjects in their own countries as well as applicable international norms and standards.

The revised declaration of also highlights the need to disseminate research results, including negative and inconclusive studies and 20008 includes a requirement for treatment and compensation for injuries related to research.

Declaration of Helsinki – WMA – The World Medical Association

All medical research subjects should be given the option of being informed about the general outcome and results of the study. FDA, ethics, and international drug trials”. The potential subject must be informed of the helsingforsdelkarationen to refuse to participate in the study or to withdraw consent to participate at any time without reprisal.

Researchers have a duty to make publicly available the results of their research on human subjects and are accountable for the completeness and accuracy of their reports. The duty to the individual was given primacy over that to society Article I.

Article 29 restates the use of placebo where helsingforsedklarationen proven’ intervention exists. Unresolved issues in international research. It clearly stated that “concern for the interests of the subject must always prevail over the interests of science and society.