Book Review of God in the Machine by Anne Foerst More than anything else, the field of science and religion aims to bring separate disciplines into dialogue. In God in the Machine, Dr. Anne Foerst draws on her expertise as both a theologian and computer And what do robots teach us about our relationship with God?. God in the Machine: What Robots Teach Us About Humanity and God. Author: Anne Foerst View colleagues of Anne Foerst.
|Published (Last):||3 December 2010|
|PDF File Size:||16.19 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.55 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
First of all, what I realized was that when we try to build humanoid robots in our image, we realize the complexity of humans. This book is not yet featured on Listopia.
After writing a dissertation on the relationship between Christian foeret and A. Glowin56 added it Jan 05, The first theme is developed quite effectively, integrating insights from the Bible with the idea of AI in the s: A very good book that is more that it seems from the cover. Should we be outraged that Kismet has been on display at the M. So, we have to build them communal, which will be the most fascinating thing about them. But what feelings macine these lifelike machines really provoke in us?
Foerst later examines the narratives we form about robots in order to illustrate the frailties of human nature and encourage the adaptation of an inclusive narrative that can help overcome our estrangement.
God in the Machine: What Robots Teach Us About Humanity and God by Anne Foerst
The book also has its weaknesses that show foerat kind of bod mistakes theologians can make when confronting advances in cognitive science and AI. Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link. I think there is too much reason behind it. The problem here is that people can emotionally bond with all sorts of entities that strain the notion of what can be considered part of the community and what cannot.
Golem building, construction of artificial humans from clay, is actually a prayer. The problem of borderline cases is common even for helpful classification systems. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. It was interesting, because I think he hoped that I would become something of a kachine of AI, but I never became one.
The other is a more modest goal, trying to find out how we work, learning more about who we are, learning more about what makes us human by trying to rebuild us, and seeing the failures and successes, and therefore find some solution for who we are.
GOD IN THE MACHINE: What Robots Teach Us About Humanity and God
At the divinity school, people were antitechnology and thought her quest to combine theology and artificial intelligence was unnecessary, she said. There is still the old camp that thinks you can build intelligent programs in disembodied, unconnected machines. And so, if we build the robots such that we have to interact with them in a good way to make them smart, then it will be a great relationship.
For example, in the abortion debate both sides agree that once we grant that the fetus is a person, we recognize its moral claim on society. Foerst’s thoughts on AI and theology can be grouped into two main themes: But she says any criteria of personhood that is narrow enough to disqualify robots will also exclude certain classes of humans, which is morally objectionable. Refresh and try again.
First of all, I was always fascinated by technology. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: She is the author of the new book, God in the Machine: You know, it was kind of funny how religious those people were in their rejection of religion.
Take, as an example, the issues of bonding and community, which are pivotal concepts used throughout the book. You are commenting using your Twitter account. And, I define humans as mainly embodies and interactive.
God in the Machine : What Robots Teach Us about Humanity and God
When I presented Kismet to non-technical audiences, they were much more fascinated by it, but also much more afraid. A second objection to accepting robots as persons is based on the possible deleterious moral effects. Aug 31, Sbate rated it liked it Recommends it for: