1 star because I can’t give it 0. Germar Rudolf: bigot, racist and holocaust denier. German Holocaust Denier Imprisoned for Inciting Racial Hatred: A German. Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of ‘Truth’ and ‘Memory’. At the start of his trial in November, Germar Rudolf had called the Holocaust ‘a. Germar Rudolf, also known as Germar Scheerer, born 29 October , is a German chemist Rudolf knew his work would be associated with Holocaust denial, but insisted that even Remer had a right to legal defense. ), ISBN ; Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory.
|Published (Last):||13 June 2016|
|PDF File Size:||20.65 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.7 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
While Sanning sums up only those victims who died as a result of direct measures taken in the course of a National Socialist policy of destruction, Benz credits all European Jewish casualties to the Holocaust, i.
Dissecting the Holocaust: Ernst Gauss: The Controversy about the Extermination of the Jews
But our justice system knows from centuries of experience that eyewitness testimony is the least valuable evidence, being the most unreliable kind. Holocaust High Priest Vol. Michael Wolffsohn, Professor of History at the University of the German Bundeswehr in Munich, realized that the Jewish side in particular considers the constant remembrance of the Holocaust  to be the third main pillar of Jewish identity today, right next to the Jewish religion and Jewish nationalism.
Just recently the German Federal Constitutional Court took an especially easy way out when it decided that one particular researcher’s scientific theses pertaining to the same subject represented an allegation of fact which, not being a statement of opinion, was not protected by the right of free expression thereof and hence could be banned outright.
In other words, self-evidentness practically came into existence as early asand Federal German courts have sought ever since to reinforce this view of history unquestioningly without encountering opposition from any quarter. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. On the other hand, it is almost impossible for truth to prevail under the constant threat of criminal prosecution.
Commandant of Auschwitz Vol. But I am not certain that disdecting will succeed. Consequently, the criticism directed at Goldhagen generally reflects poorly on his establishment critics themselves.
This revisionist thesis, advanced in the last decades primarily by, once again, citizens of the western Allied nations, not only touches the nerve of the credibility of historiography, it shatters it outright. Anyone who tries to make the legitimacy of the Federal Republic of Germany’s existence hinge on the dissectjng or falsehood of historiography about a detail of contemporary history and almost all the major media and many politicians have been doing this latelysuffers from a profound misconception of the foundations of this Republic, which is not based on the Holocaust but on the agreement of its citizens and on inalienable human and national rights.
Everything else may follow. The first and foremost goal of this discussion is the joint and sincere search for truth, in order to contribute to a reconciliation between Jews and Germans, which may perhaps result in a realization of my dream of a revival of the German-Jewish symbiosis.
Gerard Radnitzky has given an excellent account  of the origin, mechanisms and effects of German anti-Fascist opinion terrorism, a phenomenon which is also generally downplayed as ‘political correctness’ PC.
What rudof by the wayside is any recollection of such events of our common history that have positive value and could serve as a model for future co-existence.
Today, German-Jewish relations are dominated germwr the accounts of suffering between and Consequently, imaginary enemies are created. Robert Jan van Pelt’s works. The German justice system works on the presumption that the Holocaust, holoacust in its entirety and in specifics, germa ‘self-evident’, and unrefuted by public life and events, and that therefore any claims to the contrary are considered patently false until proven otherwise.
When Nolte was to give a lecture in Berlin in early Februaryhe was attacked and prevented from speaking by some 30 persons; not by anarchists, but by normal ‘anti-fascist’ intellectuals, who attacked him verbally with cries of ” Nazi! However, Goldhagen’s work is merely the logical, radical conclusion of this general tendency to selectively interpret source materials. Revisionists do not deny that the National Socialist regime deliberately, or at least through gross negligence, subjected the Jews in its sphere of influence dissdcting conditions which, in part, inflicted severe physical and mental harm, resulted in part in their physical destruction, and caused a deliberate reduction in their birth rate through the segregation of the sexes.
The Dutch historian M. James Torre marked it as to-read Mar 21, thhe But since it is egrmar early to come to any final conclusions, we have decided to include only two selected topics combined in a single article in this handbook. But back to the supposed genocide of the Jews.
In fact, however, his work contains not a single source from a technical publication. No trivia or quizzes yet. In other words, the situation hinges on the proof. Korzec was the first to offer the theory that not more than a few hundred thousand Jews were killed in gas chambers, but that many millions were killed by mass shootings in Russia. On the other hand, it does not suffice for a work to be deemed unscientific in the course of intra-disciplinary controversy between diverging material or methodological approaches.
Preview — Dissecting the Holocaust by Germar Rudolf. These and other politically incorrect views prompted the leftist press to call Hoffmann’s book dissectjng a scandal “.
Germar Rudolf – Wikipedia
Pressacand promoted to the status of central evidence for the Holocaust, even though these documents have nothing at all unusual about them when considered in context. One reason for their missing motivation can be found by simply looking at the editorial board of the world’s leading Holocaust journal Holocaust and Genocide Studies. This state is supposed to be a valiant democracy that defends itself when anti-democrats try to subvert it. Breadcrumb Disssecting Dissecting the Holocaust: But if the Holocaust is considered to be self-evident from the start and any court investigation is thereby automatically blocked, no court can or may ever come to any conclusion other than that the tbe attested to were in fact committed.
Often holocaush is considered sufficient to cite portions of documents out of their proper context, or arbitrarily select a few documents from many others of relevance.
dissectint My statement, that a point at issue for the judges in trials against Revisionists is always whose head it is that will roll: A Critically Commented Selection. In the s, Rudolf was dismissed from the Max Planck Holocqust in Stuttgart, Germany, before completing his PhD and was later sentenced to prison in Germany for promoting Holocaust denial, which is a crime in Germany prosecuted under a ger,ar prohibition on inciting hatred. Open Preview See a Problem?
In light of the aforementioned experiences with European courts and the reactions of the public it must seem downright miraculous that there are in fact members of the establishment who dare to tackle the taboo surrounding the Holocaust.
Anyone who stands up for something considers that something worth defending, i. The same goes for certain academic circles in German colleges and universities, where ideologically defined elements constantly perpetuate themselves.