The paper describes ethical issues involved in the work of a TV journalist. The author – an experienced editor and producer of TV programs – diagnoses the. etyka dziennikarska zadania mediów: role jakie powinny pełnić media epołeczeńetwie reguluje prawo prasowe. wolność to eytuacja kiedy władza. Title, Etyka dziennikarska. Author, Jan Pleszczyński. Publisher, Difin, ISBN, , Length, pages. Export Citation, BiBTeX.

Author: Tojashura Voodooshicage
Country: Bosnia & Herzegovina
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Finance
Published (Last): 15 December 2008
Pages: 472
PDF File Size: 11.65 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.95 Mb
ISBN: 782-3-59849-744-8
Downloads: 42797
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Golkis

And yet we do not study and teach journalism in a way that reflects this variegated and simultaneous engagement. A more proactive journalism, a journalism with more self-understanding of itself across time and space, a journalism that is more transparent and more amenable to reflection from the outside — all of these are pre-conditions for journalism to work more effectively in the public interest.

And thirdly, the gaps and misnomers in our scholarship still bewilder.

Implicit here is the fact that journalists need to listen more to academics and minimize their sensitivity to criticisms that academics wield. And what is journalism for — is its function to only provide information or to more creatively meld community and public citizenship?

Are mobile phones and cameras bona fide instruments of newsmaking? They include how we think about journalism, where we might have gone wrong in its study and teaching, what journalism scholarship can tell us about journalism that it has not offered so far, and how can that exchange better serve the public interest.

This has produced stubborn enclaves not only across each of the three populations but within them as well. It is our role as intellectuals to keep those problems coming. Is the online explosion so very different from the expansion into radio in the s?

So as a system of knowledge, journalism scholarship is uniquely poised to remind journalism to do two basic things. What about tweets on twitter? Journalism scholarship can teach journalists not to overgeneralize from a small number of cases, to consider events and issues incrementally, and to read.


Dziennikarz Niezależny? Etyka dziennikarska w praktyce

Finally, we have underplayed the diverse global forms of journalism. In other words, what we think has a predetermined shape and life-line, which privileges community, solidarity and power. I think the message is a simple one: Although journalism has been around for as long as publics have needed mediated information about the larger world, journalism itself experiences a schizophrenic existence with the world.

Disciplines come dziennikqrska play in this regard among journalism scholars, where historians, sociologists, political scientists, linguists and cultural analysts all remain in isolated pockets from each other, but we need to mention too how separated are our curricular sequences by medium.

We need to help foster understanding of its trappings in ways that help both journalism and the public interest thrive — each on their own terms and together.

On the one hand, journalism stretches in various forms across all of the ways in which we come together as a collective. Where would history be without journalism? Proactively fielding developments in the larger environment so as to delay, blunt or even alter the landing of such blows is instrumental for securing dziennjkarska form of journalism that will work more effectively in the public interest.

Po prostu rozsądek, czyli etyka dziennikarska

I want to identify three ways in which this tendency undermines a fuller understanding of how journalism serves the public interest. When we factor in the online environment and further yet the multi-skilling that forces journalists to learn to produce multiple platforms for one news story, we begin to realize that journalism has in fact begun to reflect real world experience more than ever before.

An energized exchange between journalism scholarship and journalism serves the public interest because it will in the end etgka the public toward a broader understanding of how journalism daiennikarska.

Thomas Kuhn was most directly associated with the now somewhat fundamental notion that knowledge depends on consensus building, on developing shared paradigms that name and characterize problems and procedures in ways that are recognized by the dzuennikarska.


Each development can and should be explained by looking beyond the here moments targeted by journalism, and it is our responsibility to help journalists recognize them as relevant.

Once consensus is established, new phenomena tend to be classified by already proven lines.

With journalists increasingly being charged with addressing crisis as the stuff of news, however, we may need to do a better job of recognizing crisis dziennikareka as a mainstay of journalism, particularly because nowhere is the public interest as high on the agenda as in the wars, terrorism and natural disasters that drive periods of crisis.

In large dziennikaarska, the schizophrenic treatment of journalism drives from a persistent gravitation toward group think. In servicing the public interest by better connecting journalism scholarship and journalism, we hearken back to something John Dewey said long ago about education: History relentlessly repeats itself: Journalism is too important to be reactive.

Etyka dziennikarska – Jan Pleszczyński – Google Books

First, our scholarly and pedagogic work has narrowed the varieties of news still primarily defining it in ways that drive a specific form of hard news over other alternatives. Not only does this reference comparative journalism in its many permutations, but it orients us to the tensions linking journalism in each location to what goes on at its boundaries.

Each of these three points orient backward rather than forward, paralleling in scholarship the reactivity we see emerging so acutely in journalists themselves. Underlying the ability to speak about journalism, then, are tensions about who can mobilize the right to speak over others.

And for whose aims? Too much of our public conversations ride on the latest media failing, deficiency or outrage. It offers an invitation to think about the social groups involved in giving it shape.