Addendum to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual: Scoring of the EORTC QLQ- CPAL. Mogens Groenvold and Morten Aagaard Petersen on behalf of the. PDF | On Apr 1, , Mogens Groenvold and others published EORTC QLQ- CPAL: The new standard in the assessment of health-related. This study aimed at developing a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30, one of the most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires in.
|Published (Last):||6 July 2017|
|PDF File Size:||2.50 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.56 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Item response theory methods were used to shorten scales. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the “citations” tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Four scales were shortened without reducing measurement precision. The purpose of this article was to conduct a review of studies utilizing qlq-c1-5pal two palliative-specific QoL instruments, their development and their relative strengths for use in advanced cancer patients.
European Journal of Cancer42 155 – Scoring, organization and item format are different; however, response options and recall period are the same. Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.
N2 – This study aimed at developing a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30, one of the most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires in oncology, for palliative care research.
EORTC QLQ-CPAL | EORTC – Quality of Life : EORTC – Quality of Life
RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers. More about this item Keywords data management ; questionnaire scoring ; Statistics Access and download statistics Corrections All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. Although significant overlap exists between both tools, there is qlq-f15-pal marked difference in the aspects of QoL assessed. Download full text from publisher File URL: It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
European Journal of CancerVol. A shortened questionnaire for cancer qlq-f15-pal in palliative care Research output: Niels Henrik Bruun Aarhus University.
QLQC Stata module for scoring of the EORTC QLQ-CPAL
European Journal of Cancer. Future studies should directly compare these two tools and validate their use through a number of administration modes. If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, elrtc encourage you to do it here. This module should be installed from within Stata by typing “ssc install qlqc15”.
Symptom clusters using the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL in palliative radiotherapy
Help us Corrections Found an error or omission? For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corrections All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors.
This allows to link your profile to this item. Depending on the research questions, it may be supplemented by additional items, modules or questionnaires.
Both tools cover the core items eorfc to patients with advanced cancers and can be supplemented with disease-specific tools. Each instrument has unique strengths and weaknesses and choice between these tools is dependent on the investigator and study needs.
The study included interviews with 41 patients and 66 health care professionals in palliative care to determine the appropriateness, relevance and importance of the various domains of the QLQ-C Main research site Explore Bristol Research.
Shorter quality-of-life QoL assessments are beneficial for palliative patients as they reduce burden associated with completing personal, and at times stressful, questionnaires. You can help adding them by using this form.
The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire: validation study for Spanish bone metastases patients
Important dimensions not covered by the questionnaire were identified. Windows users should not attempt to download these files with a web browser. A comparison between both questionnaires in terms of development, characteristics, validation and use was conducted.
General contact details of provider: