Kathryn M. Connor, M.D.,n and Jonathan R.T. Davidson, M.D. Resilience scale (CD-RISC) comprises of 25 items, each rated on a 5-point scale. (0–4), with. The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) was created to address aspects of resilience and for use in clinical practice. Resilience is considered as the. We describe a new rating scale to assess resilience. The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) comprises of 25 items, each rated on a.

Author: Gardami Gardall
Country: Argentina
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 12 February 2011
Pages: 456
PDF File Size: 13.39 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.81 Mb
ISBN: 647-4-16904-343-6
Downloads: 77888
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gale

The authors drew inspiration for the scale’s content from the work of previous researchers of hardiness, most notably S. Clinical evaluation of a measure to assess combat exposure. This particular population often experiences unique trauma and stressors compared to the general population, such as combat exposure. Ensuring that a measure can be applied across different languages and cultures often proves to be a difficult task due to differences in societal norms and trouble with translation.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Psychometric properties and applications in psychopharmacological trials. Development of a new resilience scale: Kobasa [2] and M.

Multiple investigations have called into question the five factor model presented by Connor and Davidson. For example, Factor 5 spiritual influences only cd-risv two items that support it. Resilience as a predictor for emotional response to the diagnosis and surgery in breast cancer patients.


Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC).

These items were chosen because Connor and Davidson deemed them capable of “etymologically capturing the essence of resilience. Results indicated that resilience acted as a protective factor resiliecne the development of PTSD and that it was significantly related to other aspects of psychological functioning e.

The scale demonstrated good psychometric properties and factor analysis yielded five factors. Another study used the original item CD-RISC to look at the relationship between resilience and the emotional response of women experiencing a diagnosis of breast cancer and breast cancer surgery. History, efficacy and links to moral and character education.

Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale – Wikipedia

Articles with short description Orphaned articles from May All orphaned articles. Resilience may be viewed as a measure of stress coping ability and, as such, could be an important target of treatment in anxiety, depression, and stress reactions. Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitpsychologie, Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43 12 The scale demonstrates that resilience is modifiable and can improve with treatment, with greater improvement corresponding to higher levels of global improvement.

Resilience in the United States Air Force: Psychosocial buffers of traumatic stress, depressive symptoms, and psychosocial difficulties in veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom: Stress and Health, Retrieved from ” https: Copyright Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Davidson as a means of assessing resilience.


connor-davjdson The authors recognize that this could be considered an issue since the concept of resilience is often only considered relevant when related to the experience of trauma. Cross-cultural validity of the Connor-Davidson Scale: Exploration of the resilience construct in posttraumatic stress disorder severity and functional correlates in military combat veterans who have served since September 11, It assessed resilience in members of the general population as well as patients with Post-traumatic Stress Disorderdepressionand anxiety.

Because of the discrepancies in these findings surrounding factor structure, the subscales of the original CD-RISC are not recommended to be used alone. Analysis of factor score interactions within a homogeneous sample.

Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC).

Another potential reason for the inconsistency in these findings is that the number of items in the original scale is insufficient. Connor and Davidson recognized the limitations of the CD-RISC, citing lack of validation against objective measures of resilience, the complications of defining resilience in resilidnce to the measure i.

A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1 1 ,