The (CAARS) Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scales, published by WPS for clinicians, educators and researchers, can be purchased online. Description: The Symptom Checklist is an instrument consisting of the eighteen DSM-IV-TR criteria. Six of the eighteen questions were found to be the most. All participants completed the Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS)—self -report version (Conners et al., ). Responses to this item scale yield.

Author: Marn Faetaxe
Country: Timor Leste
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 28 October 2014
Pages: 276
PDF File Size: 15.17 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.36 Mb
ISBN: 213-6-50245-382-9
Downloads: 77479
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kezilkree

This investigation examined the reliability and construct validity of self- and observer-ratings on the CAARS using a large sample of adults referred to a university-affiliated ADHD clinic for assessment of attention problems. Limitations and Future Directions The findings reported here must be considered in light of several limitations.

Though current clinical practice guidelines suggest that diagnostic evaluation should include a comprehensive interview and self- and observer- rating scales, limited information is available on how best to integrate discrepant data AACAP, Self- and observer- ratings on the CAARS provide clinically relevant data about attention problems in adults, but the instrument does not effectively distinguish between ADHD and other adult psychiatric disorders.

Both the self- and observer-rating forms of the CAARS were used in this investigation; the two versions are identical except that they are normed separately.

Results Item-level concordance rates ranged from slight to fair. As such, our findings with respect to discriminant validity may be limited.

Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS)

Percentages were then calculated by dividing number of true positives sensitivity or the number of true negatives specificity by the total sample. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. Psychometric caaes of an adult ADHD diagnostic interview. Given that one of the difficulties in diagnosing ADHD lies in determining how cxars the behavior is in relation to developmental and cultural norms, these findings suggest that it may be critical for clinicians to elicit concrete examples of behaviors and clear ratings of their frequency i.


If your required component is not listed, please contact Customer Services on: The utility of self-report measures and the continuous performance test in the diagnosis of ADHD in adults. As a second measure of convergent and discriminant validity, the number of symptoms rated as present on the CAARS was compared with diagnosis as determined by the clinician. Declaration of Conflicting Interests.

Self-report, Observer-completed – 10 to 15 minutes. American Journal of Psychiatry.

The primary diagnoses for these participants were as follows: Resource Library Sample forms, test reports, and more. Cluster scores based on self-ratings varied widely in their degree of specificity to ADHD diagnosis.

Specificity, on the other hand, reflects the proportion of cases in which the absence of the disorder is correctly identified; an index with a high specificity may be seen as having a low Type I error rate. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, part I: Clinically-elevated cluster T -scores demonstrated a relatively poor balance of sensitivity and specificity in predicting ADHD diagnosis.

CAARS™ – Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale™

These versions are ideal when time is limited. Limitations of this study included the small sample size and participant diagnoses not being confirmed using a semi-structured clinical interview.

Author manuscript; available in PMC Jan Request a quote for the items currently in your cart. To caarx to address this gap in the literature, this investigation was designed to examine the following: In sum, clinical analysis and synthesis of the range of interview, self-report, and collateral data is critical for accurate differential diagnosis of ADHD in adults.


National Center for Biotechnology InformationU.

Specifically, few studies have examined concordance between different raters of ADHD symptoms in adults or the degree to which information provided by each rater contributes to differential diagnosis; addhd is even less information as to how well rating scales function in distinguishing adult ADHD from other commonly diagnosed adult disorders. Unfortunately there were too few supervisors or coaches represented in our sample of observers to address this issue.

For these analyses ADHD was considered to be present even if it was not listed as the primary diagnosis; a mood disorder, anxiety disorder, or other disorder was identified as the primary diagnosis only in the absence of ADHD.

Video Title Goes Here

Van Addh1 Kristina K. Reliability, validity, and diagnostic sensitivity. Directory of Sensory Integration Certified Therapists. Concordance was higher at the level of symptom clusters.

As such, clinically-elevated T -scores on the CAARS clusters are relatively limited in the information they contribute to differentiating ADHD from other psychiatric disorders that commonly manifest in adulthood. The site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalized service.